Sep 28

Question	Decision
James -Ranking system	Anna: argument against hive.one, for the shipped product. Some groups are angry about being ranked, want an opt-out. Twitter already does it, many users play the game. Our project purpose was never to define who's important. We're experimenting with the system. We need to bring core devs as advisors, if we're not working with them – we won't accomplish much. James: we're going to stick to primary sources only, we won't link to else. The ranking list won't be the first view of the stances. Ranking is not important, but understanding the very top thinks in 1 way, and the bottom in another provides some info. If hive.one decides to exclude people it would be the same in our app, if smbd decides to go private – we respect that as well. We'll be looking for other alternatives as well. No our opt-out for now, as we have no control over that. Deam: same opinion Max: hive.one is down for now, can be a persistent problem
Max -User Stories	Agree to define specs in the format: As %user% I want %feature% in order to %profit% James: + We can check them with the user reps then
Deam - Web3	James filled the form